Friday, April 11, 2008

Changing Immigration in the United States: Will this have an Impact on Hispanic Health?

Last week, my focus was the potential health problems Californian children are facing during this climate of astronomical state budget cuts. Currently, the government’s role in the lives of Hispanics is increasing, especially during this time when transition is imminent. This week, I continue my exploration of the blogosphere in search of innovative and informative blogs that address topics of interest that are important to the Latin American/Hispanic communities. My examination has led me to two works that tackle the topic of immigration in the United States and some of the repercussions with which it is associated. The first post, titled “Central American Migrants Reportedly Facing Increased Dangers,” comes from Deborah Bonello, a writer for the Los Angeles Times blog titled La Plaza. In it, Bonello speaks about the harsh journeys illegal travelers face when migrating from Central America through Mexico to their final destination in the United States. Published April 10, 2008, the author makes a reference to Special Order 40, a police mandate implemented in the 1980’s to prevent LAPD officers from obtaining the immigration status of detained suspects. It was passed in hopes of encouraging illegal residents to report crimes without fear of being punished. However, critics of the mandate believe that it prevents criminals, such as gang members, from receiving quick deportation. The second post titled, "Health Care for Hispanics Stays Steady," comes from Aileen Streng, writer for the Potomac News on InsideNoVa.com. On March 21, 2008, Streng states that the health clinics of Prince William County, Virginia have not seen a decline in the amount of patients, most of whom are typically Hispanic, even during recent crackdown against illegitimate residency in the state. My responses to both author’s posts can be viewed below as well as on each respective blog.

My Response to:
“Central American Migrants Reportedly Facing Increased Dangers”

Deborah Bonello,

First off, I would like to thank you for your informative and timely post. It is wonderful to read a blog that stresses the importance of issues concerning the Hispanic and Latin American communities. The fact that you decided to begin your piece with a mention of Special Order 40, really ties in this story with something that is significant to many Californians. Based on other posts that I have read on La Plaza, I have realized that many Los Angeles residents reserve strong sentiments regarding the issue of immigration. Relating this story about Central American immigrants to the buzz surrounding the LAPD, in my opinion, strengthens the appeal of your work. I appreciated the poignant observations you make about the tragic deaths that are taking place due to harsh conditions Central American migrants face in Mexico (pictured below to the right). Although your post served as an informative commentary, it could have been even more interesting to read your perspective on the case at hand. The sheer irony that undocumented Mexicans expect better treatment than the illegal travelers who pass through their own country is enough to spark a colorful debate. Also, since Special Order 40 deals directly with the possibility of deportation from the United States, do you believe is it likely to cause a chain reaction in minimizing relocation to other countries? You make reference to Olga R. Rodriguez who wrote, “Despite efforts to secure its own southern border, Mexico doesn’t try to stop its own citizens from crossing north”. I was able to locate and read her expose on newsvine.com. The parallels Rodriguez draws between the situations that Mexican and American citizens are facing, in terms of undocumented refugees, shines a light on the hypocrisy of the Mexican government. On one hand, the horror stories that accompany these travelers, which are enough to inspire nightmares, have not seemed to deter the amount of people that risk their lives in hopes of a better one. On the other hand, according to your piece, it seems that these stricter laws in Mexico are causing a decrease in migration to the country. Is this indicative of what the American government will have to resort to in order to see a significant change? These are just a few questions you may consider addressing in future posts.

My Response to:
“Health Care for Hispanics Stays Steady”

Aileen Streng,

I would like to start off by thanking you for writing about such an important topic, not only for Hispanics but for Americans in general. The increased attention surrounding relocation in the United States has definitely had a dramatic impact in this country, especially during the presidential elections. I was surprised to read that the health clinics in Prince William County are not experiencing a decline in the amount of patients they are seeing (pictured above to the left), particularly because of the current interest concerning Special Order 40 in Los Angeles. Recently, Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa has been trying to crackdown on gang violence in the city. Many critics believe that eliminating Special Order 40 will strikingly reduce the possibility of criminals unlawfully residing in California . It seems that many illegitimate residents are nervous about drawing any kind of attention to themselves, which is significantly evident when they refuse to seek medical attention. Hispanics often steer clear of the doctor’s office for chronic illnesses such as hypertension and elevated blood glucose, but with this increase of risks associated with the act of immigration, avoiding the doctor can be even more dangerous than ever. It is reasonable to predict that there will be changes in the resettlement laws in this country with the inauguration of a new leader. Do you believe these changes will make hospitals and clinics safe havens for those who are essentially being banished? Or will doctors be forced to interrogate their patients before medical attention is provided? It is interesting when you mention, "the health district and Potomac Hospital are seeing a decline in patients [in] their prenatal clinics", while the overall amount of patients being seen has remained relatively stable. Although health care officials do not offer an explanation for this decline, do you believe that this could be attributed to the increased enforcement working against illegal immigrants? Whatever the outcomes may be, it is important to realize that major changes are likely to take place in the near future. The real task is to figure out exactly how these changes will affect Americans on a personal level, whether for ourselves or within our families.

1 comment:

CHH said...

Wow, great post ER. Considering I do not have much of a background in the current legislation and treatment of illegal immigrants, your post definitely served to fill that void, not to mention excite me in gaining more knowledge within the field. Being a California resident my whole life, this topic and the legislation established by future leaders is very important to follow.

It seems to me that Special Order 40 provoked an enormous backlash and caused many unintended results. Also, in Los Angeles, turning attention towards gang violence and away from immigration issues, it is evident that the topic was never provided an adequate solution. Considering the importance of this issue not only in California but throughout the nation, I find it troubling that we have not joined together to create an effective plan, across the board. Attention to this issue is critical considering the presidential debates and health care policy of the future candidates. I am curious to know the answers to your questions that you directed in your first comment, but I also have a few more myself. Where do you think the line will be drawn? Do you think this is a topic that can be solved with but one solution? In looking at both the past and future proposals, what does this mean for doctors in the health care field? How will this effect them? All in all, terrific job on your post.

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.